Skip to content
Preflect
Case Study

Minimizing Risk During Onboarding with Enigma

Check real consumer revenue before any sales touchpoints.

Customer Preflect
Industry AI-Powered Ad Targeting
Use Case Onboarding Risk / Lead Qualification
Product Enigma Revenue Data
Download the one-pager (PDF)
30%
Increase in revenue
3.3x
More bad leads blocked in the backtest
Zero
Large loss events since implementation

The Client

Preflect is a leading AI-powered ad targeting and campaign management provider who regularly works with small ecommerce companies making between $0-1M a year in annual sales. In the past, Preflect used other data vendors like Clearbit and Storeleads to sort through inbound leads to minimize the risk of onboarding low-value clients.

The Challenge

Preflect's inbound leads come from a form on their website that companies can fill out to book a live demo of Preflect's product. While Preflect often works with small ecommerce businesses, they wanted to make sure that the small companies they worked with were established with sales. Stores that didn't, explained Preflect CEO and Founder Ian McCue, often "converted poorly, churned quickly, and posed chargeback and fraud risks."

44%
No-show rate from prospective leads who booked demos
$100,000
What one bad lead had cost Preflect in the past

Other data vendors weren't providing the timely and accurate data needed to establish if a company was a good long-term fit for Preflect. Instead, the company's sales team had to manually qualify leads via a time-consuming demo process, made even more costly by a 44% no-show rate from prospective leads who booked demos. Moreover, not all bad leads were stopped with this manual process, and these low-value customers chargebacked at a much higher rate. Losses had a material impact on Preflect's business: in the past one bad lead, for example, had cost Preflect up to $100,000.

Preflect wanted to see if Enigma's data could be used to qualify these leads before any sales touchpoint, in order to minimize the risk of losing time and money on bad customers.

The Test

Preflect compared a set of inbound leads they had already qualified or disqualified manually through a binary check using Enigma's data: whether or not Enigma tracked the company as having any revenue within the past 12 months before their inbound date.

One binary check

Does Enigma track the company as having any revenue within the past 12 months?

Positive card revenue

Pursue the lead

No revenue observed

Disqualify before any sales touchpoint

The Results

By only pursuing inbound leads that had positive card revenue in Enigma data, Preflect's lead disqualification rate would increase from 18% to 60% with Enigma, or 3.3x more disqualified leads blocked.

Manual review alone
18 of 100 leads disqualified
With Enigma revenue data
60 of 100 leads disqualified
Pursued Disqualified by manual review Additionally disqualified with Enigma

For every 100 inbound leads, Enigma's revenue check would have blocked 60 before any sales touchpoint, 3.3x the manual review baseline. Rates from Preflect's backtest; the 100-lead grid is illustrative.

"Most data vendors struggle in the $0-1M/year annual sales bucket. The difference between $0 and $100k is the difference between a bad lead / fraud risk and a good lead. Enigma's data enables us to differentiate between these."
Ian McCue, CEO and Founder, Preflect

The Outcome

Since implementing Enigma, Preflect has had much lower fraud rates among new customers and has had no large loss events like the $100,000 charge in the past. Moreover, the rise in sales efficiency led to a 30% increase in revenue for the company.

Qualify leads before any sales touchpoint

See how Enigma's card revenue data separates established businesses from bad leads and fraud risk.